My article was “When it Comes To Marketing, Twitter Destroys Facebook,”
http://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-destroys-facebook-2010-12.
This article is based on a study conducted by Social Twist which makes a comparison between facebook and twitter. The author provides a series of pros and cons for using each websites and reaches the conclusion that using twitter is a much better marketing choice than facebook. According to the author twitter offers more return on investment, reaches a more specific audience and consumer bases, and avails itself with a technologically sophisticated audience. On the other hand, facebook’s biggest asset, its large social media traffic, is also considered as a negative point because many of the users are not target consumers.
In my opinion, twitter looks like a more professional site and facebooks like a more social site. At the same time however if I had to advertise a product I would still go for facebook since it is a much bigger site. However, I also think that instead of choosing between sites a smarter idea to increase exposure levels is to post ads on as many sites as possible.
Orcania Burgos
Kean University's first cutting edge social media marketing class with 17 students developed this blog to explore the in's and out's of social media. #Kean University marketing for social media blog includes, but is not limited to, current market trends and highlighting digital writing practices, all while engaging in reader commentary. This blog offers analysis and insights from New Jersey's Kean University "Social Media for Marketing" students.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The question I was planning to ask in class was:
ReplyDeleteAs a marketing student, do you really think that twitter is better than facebook to post your futures ads?
Orcania Burgos